Presented by

  • Josh Berkus

    Josh Berkus
    https://berkus.org

    Josh Berkus has been contributing to various FOSS projects since 1998, including Linux, PostgreSQL, OpenOffice, MySQL, CouchDB, OpenSolaris, and others. Currently he works on Kubernetes for Red Hat. Josh is on the OSI Board, the CNCF Code of Conduct Committee, and co-organizes SCALE and Container Plumbing. He is local to Portland.

  • McCoy Smith

    McCoy Smith
    @mccoysmith
    https://www.lexpan.law

    P. McCoy Smith is the Founding Attorney at Lex Pan Law LLC, a full-service technology and intellectual property law firm based in Portland, Oregon, U.S.A and Opsequio LLC, an open source compliance consultancy. Prior to his current position, he spent 20 years in the legal department of a Fortune 50 multinational technology company as a business unit intellectual property specialist; among his duties was setting up the free & open source legal function and policies for that company. He preceded his in-house experience with 8 years in private practice in a large New York City-based boutique intellectual property law firm, working simultaneously as a U.S. patent litigator and U.S. patent prosecutor. He was also a patent examiner at the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office prior to attending law school. He is licensed to practice law in Oregon, Washington State, California & New York and to prosecute patent applications in the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office; he is also a registered Trademark and Patent Agent with the Canadian Intellectual Property Office. He has degrees from Colorado State University (Bachelor of Science, Mechanical Engineering, with honors), Johns Hopkins University (Masters of Liberal Arts) and the University of Virginia (Juris Doctor). While in private practice, and continuing into his in-house career, he taught portions of the U.S. patent bar exam for a long-standing and well-known patent bar exam preparation course, and from 2014-2020 was on the editorial board of the Journal of Open Law, Technology & Society (JOLTS), and is currently on the editorial board of the American Intellectual Property Law Quarterly Journal (AIPLAQJ). He is the author or co-author of chapters on open source and copyright and patents in “Open Source Law, Policy & Practice” (2022, Oxford University Press). He lectures frequently around the world on free and open source issues as well as other intellectual property topics.

Abstract

Why are the non-discriminatory clauses (5 and 6) part of the Open Source Definition? Why does anyone care? Why shouldn't project owners be able to limit where the software can be used or prevent bad people from using the software? These two clauses are the most poorly understood parts of the Open Source Definition, and the ones that would-be license writers most frequently want to compromise. They are not a moral requirement; instead, they are compulsive in order to sustain how FOSS is packaged, distributed, and used. An Open Source Initiative board member will explain, in developer-friendly terms, why you should care about OSD5 and OSD6, and an attorney will explain why they are legally required. Attendees will learn why to retain these freedoms in their own license-writing, and why the are important when consuming other people's projects.